Every time I hear something new about PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, for those who for some reason don’t know), I find myself wondering how much longer an organization can push the envelope of complete lunacy. This time, as I am sure many have heard, they are appealing to Ben & Jerry’s for a cause they think is as noble as any;
To exclusively use human breast milk to make their ice cream.
Barring the fact that they cited a recent Swiss restaurant owner for going the same road, the publicity stunt leaves me wondering just how far gone you’d have to be in order to join an organization which suggests such a ridiculous idea.
To be honest, it’s not the idea that weirds me out (although it most certainly does, to a degree). What I find the most unbelievable about this ludicrous claim is that Tracy Reiman, the Vice President of this coterie of wackos inferred that “A move to human breast milk would lessen the suffering of dairy cows and their babies on factory farms and benefit human health.”
My intuition tells me that if dairy cows are allegedly “suffering” because of all of the milk they’re being forced to give to us, then what makes it any more decent or “painless” for human beings to do the same thing? If you ask me, persuading a company as big as Ben & Jerry’s to make a switch like that would likely require an enormous amount of women to become needlessly pregnant in order to foot the bill for all of that required milk. I’d say that’s a good amount of suffering in and of itself, not to mention the fact that kids tend to like ice cream.
And let’s not even talk about how many cows would be out of a good working living.
Here’s the best part–Reiman insists that cow’s milk causes a whole plethora of medical problems. Here’s an excerpt straight from the letter;
“Using cow’s milk for your ice cream is a hazard to your customer’s health. Dairy products have been linked to juvenile diabetes, allergies, constipation, obesity, and prostate and ovarian cancer. The late Dr. Benjamin Spock, America’s leading authority on child care, spoke out against feeding cow’s milk to children, saying it may play a role in anemia, allergies, and juvenile diabetes and in the long term, will set kids up for obesity and heart disease-America’s number one cause of death.”
So one guy insisted that milk from a cow was responsible for diabetes, constipation, obesity, cancer, and even DEATH? And here I was wrongly thinking that junk food and an unhealthy lifestyle are what lead to diabetes and obesity. I suppose it’s not worth it to mention that it’s also responsible for strong bones and added protection from osteoporosis. I can’t believe all of this scientific knowledge slipped right by the FDA. Looks like Louis Pasteur was a sham after all.
In 100% honest to goodness retrospect, this is the same PETA who advocated for all of these previous causes;
- The Euthanization of Knut the Polar Bear, a bear cub who was abandoned by its mother and forced to live in the loving care of German zookeepers
- The complete liberation (and possible euthanization) of all pets, zoo animals, and helper dogs
- The abolishing of animal research as a means to treat and cure ailments such as Diabetes, Hepatitis, AIDS, and over 100 other diseases and conditions
- Visitation of the Princeton Review’s “Top 10 Party Schools” to advocate the systemic drinking of beer instead of milk
I don’t mind drinking my fair share of beer, but when an organization reveals through its tax documents that it euthanized three times as many animals as it has “rescued,” I’m forced to wonder what other crackpot claims it will presume to make to further its cause. And I thought they were for the ETHICAL treatment of animals.
Human milk? Maybe it’s not actually in our breast interest. Oops, that was a spelling mistake. Seriously.